Victim Refuses to Sign Complaint

Why was I arrested for domestic battery when the victim refused to sign a complaint?

by Sami Azhari on April 2, 2011

All too often a person involved in a hostile confrontation in a domestic relationship will call the police without knowing the serious legal consequences that follow. Usually the person dialing 911 does not intend to have anyone arrested. The person’s motive is usually to calm the situation. But unfortunately, once the 911 call is made, that person loses control of the situation.

Police departments nationwide usually have a policy in place for domestic violence cases. If they are dispatched to a domestic dispute, most all police departments direct their officers to make an arrest. The officers on scene are supposed to make an arrest even where the complainant (ie, person who called 911) says he or she does not want anybody arrested.

It does not matter that the alleged victim refuses to sign a complaint or to make a statement for the police. Where the police have probable cause to believe a domestic battery took place, they take the suspect into custody, and charge him with violating 720 ILCS 5/12-3.2, the Illinois domestic battery statute. And then it is time to retain an attorney.

Domestic offenses are the exception: police make an arrest despite the fact that the complainant does not want anyone arrested. In other crimes, the police only make an arrest where the complainant wants it.

The reason for this unusual policy is the potential civil liability of the police department.

Police departments get sued all the time. Police officers take on many legal duties in the course of their employment, including life-saving emergency medical care, CPR, etc. A legal duty is, generally speaking, an obligation to protect the person they were dispatched to assist.

For example, law enforcement officers are usually the first responders in serious automobile accidents, and they are trained to provide at least minimal, life-saving medical care before medical professionals arrive.

Where injured motorists die, wrongful death suits regularly ensue. These lawsuits name the police department, officer, and municipality as defendants, and accuse them of negligence. Basically, a civil lawsuit says that the police violated their legal duty to protect a person in that they were negligent.

And so, police officers conduct themselves in a way to avoid civil liability.

When it comes to investigating crimes, the courts have said the police have no legal duty to protect people. Wrongful death suits have been filed against police officers, departments, and cities alleging the police were negligent because they failed to prevent a person from becoming the victim of a homicide. The legal theory underpinning these suits has been, the police were negligent and if they had done their jobs, the victim would still be alive.

The courts have all ruled that police officers have immunity in these lawsuits. They cannot be sued for failure to stop a criminal offense from occurring. The rationale is that the police could never prevent all crimes, and so they should not be liable where crimes occur.

But the rule is different in the context of domestic violence.

Where the police are aware of a report of domestic violence and take no action to protect the victim, then they can be liable for failure to protect that person if they become the victim of a later crime.

This special rule comes from the courts’ position that a person in a violent domestic relationship is likely to be the victim of another domestic offense. The courts have held that in these cases, where the police do nothing, they are not immune from liability. A wrongful death law suit can proceed against the department.

And so, when a person makes a 911 call during a domestic argument, an arrest is sure to follow. The police taken the suspect into custody in every case to protect themselves.

Previous post:

Next post: