IDOC Early Release

There was a time in Illinois when inmates could get released from state prison in only days. It was the era of “dress-in-dress-out.”

Those days are long gone, but the state penitentiary has re-instituted another form of early release. The new early release program has caused confusion in courtrooms throughout the state. To understand it, a look back at history is needed.

In 2009, the state economy was in the worst part of the Great Recession, and government needed to save money. The Department of Corrections devised a scheme to release inmates early, saving on costs and decreasing population. But, they went too far and politics caught up with them.

While the state penitentiary was supposed to keep inmates in custody for at least 60 days before reducing their sentences with early release credits, IDOC was giving inmates credit from day 1. The result was that prisoners who had sentencing credit for their time in county jails awaiting trial were eligible for release on their first day in IDOC.

The lore was that these inmates would go downstate on a bus in their county jail garb and once they reached their IDOC facility, dress into IDOC clothes, and then change into civilian attire for release. The practice was dubbed “dress-in-dress-out.”

Investigative reporters from the Associated Press exposed the practice in December 2009. Allegedly IDOC had distributed a memo about an “MGT Push,” referring to using meritorious good time credit to reduce prison population.

At the time, Governor Pat Quinn was mired in a tough re-election campaign against State Senator Bill Brady. He immediately signed an order putting a stop to the program.

But he didn’t just stop the award of credit from the first day. Rather, he stopped the award of all credit, including a 6-month good conduct credit authorized by statute, 730 ILCS 5/3-6-3(a)(3). And so, inmates began staying in prison for longer than ever.

Most would agree that the decision was political. Quinn won the election, but then-Director of IDOC Michael Randle was forced to resign.

On February 22, 2013, IDOC re-implemented the early release program with a few changes. While dress-in-dress-out may be over, there are some similarities to the early release program pre-2009.

First and foremost, the requirement of serving 60 days before receiving other early release credits is back. But this time, it is written into law. Before 2009, the 60-day requirement was unwritten and no one complied with it. Now this is the rule followed in every case.

The 60-day requirement created the term, “61-day wonder,” which describes an inmate who is immediately eligible for release after serving 60 days. A prisoner serving 1 year IDOC on an ordinary, non-violent Class 4 felony should become a 61-day wonder.

The 6-month good conduct credit is back, too. While the Code of Corrections calls it good conduct credit, IDOC is calling it Supplemental Sentence Credit (SSC). But the name is not the only thing that has changed. There are more restrictions.

The Department of Corrections has provided the following guidance:

For an offender to be eligible for an award of SSC, first and foremost, he or she must have served more than 60 days in IDOC custody and be serving a sentence for offenses that are not excluded from an award pursuant to Section 3-6-3(a)(3) of the Code of Corrections (730 ILCS 5/3-6-3(a)(3)). Additionally, some offenders, by the nature of their current commitment offenses, will only be eligible for up to 90 days of SSC pursuant to Section 3-6-3(a)(3) of the Code of Corrections.

There are additional administrative rule requirements that must be met in order for an offender to be eligible for an award of SSC. The offender:

  • must not be subject to review under the Sexually Violent Person’s Act,
  • must not have been found guilty of a 100 level disciplinary offense (violated while in custody) under 20 Ill. Adm. Code 504,
  • must not have any pending criminal charges committed during the current incarceration,
  • must not have been returned to the Department for a violation of his or her parole or mandatory supervised release during their current incarceration,
  • must not have voluntarily quit or have been terminated for disciplinary reasons from a boot camp program,
  • if recommended by a court, must have completed substance abuse treatment or been waived from the requirement by the Department, and
  • must have completed mandatory sex offender treatment (if necessary) or been waived of the requirement by the Department (if applicable).

IDOC has gone out of its way to warn that this credit is discretionary and no one is entitled to it. But that may be for appearances, because the prison is overcrowded and underfunded.

The state prison system has room for 33,000 inmates. But the population is about 49,000. IDOC facilities are now turning gymnasiums into living space for minimum security inmates. Tamms maximum security prison was closed and the state plans to close Dwight women’s correctional center, too.

Critics say that this program will do nothing to reduce over-population because the requirements are too stringent.

Prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges should follow this story closely.

Truth-in-sentencing: defendants must serve more than 50% of the sentence imposed

March 20, 2013
Thumbnail image for Truth-in-sentencing: defendants must serve more than 50% of the sentence imposed

Defendants in felony cases are subject to special rules in sentencing. Compared to misdemeanor sentencing, felonies are complicated. The court is governed by obscure rules that can sometimes produce unexpected results. And the last thing a defense attorney wants in court is to advise a client on a sentence and have something unexpected come up. [...]

Read the full article

First felony offense eligible for deferred prosecution under Offender Initiative Program

December 29, 2012
Thumbnail image for First felony offense eligible for deferred prosecution under Offender Initiative Program

A person who is charged with a felony but has no criminal background will benefit from a new state law in 2013 that allows for dismissal. The Offender Initiative Program is a new statute modeled after the deferred prosecution program developed by Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez. The statute will apply in all counties [...]

Read the full article

Misdemeanor convictions that cannot be sealed: crimes of violence

November 23, 2012
Thumbnail image for Misdemeanor convictions that cannot be sealed: crimes of violence

A person who is found guilty of a misdemeanor can have his record expunged in most circumstances. Most misdemeanors allow the court to impose a term of supervision if the defendant has no criminal history. Supervision is not a conviction, and it can be expunged. A conviction, however, cannot be expunged. It can only be [...]

Read the full article

Job applicants with criminal records may find employment under new EEOC policy

October 29, 2012
Thumbnail image for Job applicants with criminal records may find employment under new EEOC policy

As anyone with a criminal record can tell you, one conviction can have a devastating impact on your future. When you apply for a job with a criminal record, you usually don’t expect to make it past the background check. But that all may change soon under an important policy change with the Equal Employment [...]

Read the full article

Racial profiling by Illinois police? Statistics show minorities ticketed more than whites

August 31, 2012
Thumbnail image for Racial profiling by Illinois police? Statistics show minorities ticketed more than whites

Chicago radio station WBBM recently reported that statistics show that during traffic stops, minorities are charged with traffic offenses disproportionately. Depending on their sources, statistics can be misleading. But these numbers come from a source that even prosecutors and judges would acknowledge as an authority: the Illinois Department of Transportation. A WBBM Newsradio analysis of [...]

Read the full article

Illinois theft laws: elements of the offense and penalties

June 11, 2012
Thumbnail image for Illinois theft laws: elements of the offense and penalties

The offense of theft under Illinois law is misunderstood. Many people think that because it is not a violent offense, and in some cases, it has no discernible victim, it is not a serious offense. This thinking is wrong. Theft can result in a jail sentence. A person who is arrested for theft, assuming he [...]

Read the full article

Procedure for stalking no contact order in Illinois

May 31, 2012
Thumbnail image for Procedure for stalking no contact order in Illinois

Illinois courts have a new law that allows an individual to seek a restraining order against another. In 2010, state lawmakers in Springfield passed a bill creating a stalking no contact order. The restraining order that is available under this statute differs from an order of protection and a sexual assault civil no contact order. [...]

Read the full article

Cook County to host annual expungement summit June 2, 2012

May 1, 2012
Thumbnail image for Cook County to host annual expungement summit June 2, 2012

All persons who have ever been arrested in Cook County should be aware of the free expungement seminar scheduled for June 2, 2012. Under Illinois law, any person who is arrested and charged with a crime has a record with the Illinois State Police that can be disseminated nationwide. The record of the arrest remains [...]

Read the full article

Important changes to Illinois retail theft laws in the year 2012

April 24, 2012
Thumbnail image for Important changes to Illinois retail theft laws in the year 2012

Illinois state law concerning retail theft has seen some significant changes in the year 2012. State lawmakers in Springfield have overhauled the retail theft statute. First, the offense is no longer found under 720 ILCS 5/16A-1. That section was repealed, and replaced by Section 16-25. All charges for retail theft written in 2012 fall under [...]

Read the full article